Science 2.0 – Is Open Access Science the Future? Is posting raw results online, for all to see, a great tool or a great risk? By M. Mitchell Waldrop: “Science 2.0 generally refers to new practices of scientists who post raw experimental results, nascent theories, claims of discovery and draft papers on the Web for others to see and comment on. Proponents say these “open access” practices make scientific progress more collaborative and therefore more productive. Critics say scientists who put preliminary findings online risk having others copy or exploit the work to gain credit or even patents. Despite pros and cons, Science 2.0 sites are beginning to proliferate; one notable example is the OpenWetWare project started by biological engi­neers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.”

• Public Library of Science On-Line Edition
• 3 Quarks Daily, “where a group of bloggers write about science and culture”
• OpenWetWare project at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
• UsefulChem – “This is an open source science project wiki in chemistry led by the Bradley Laboratory at Drexel University.”