Accurate, Focused Research on Law, Technology and Knowledge Discovery Since 2002

Daily Archives: August 3, 2005

Judge Roberts’ Answers to Senate Judiciary Committee Questionnaire

Judge John G. Roberts’ responses to the Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire comprise 83 pages, and are available in PDF (thanks Mike). The committee has yet to set a date for hearings on his confirmation, which are anticipated for September.
Related reference:

  • National Archives News – John G. Roberts: Department of Justice Record Group 60 has been processed for release. One folder of records from Record Group 60: Department of Justice, Files of the Attorney General, entitled “John G. Roberts, Jr. MISC” has been processed for release. These records are available online in PDF, and an item list is available here.
  • CRS Report on Recess Appointments by the President

    Recess Appointments, A Legal Overview, July 26, 2005 (20 pages, PDF), focuses on the “historical application and interpretation” of the Recess Appointments Clause of the Constitution. Related references: Rappaport, Michael B., The Original Meaning of the Recess Appointments Clause, (October 6, 2004). CRS Report: Recess Appointments, Frequently Asked Questions, March 15, 2005. Continue Reading

    Advocacy Groups Comment on Wiretapping Inflight Digital Communications

    As a follow-up to my July 11, 2005 posting, Wiretapping In-Flight Passenger Internet and Wireless Communications, see comments (17 pages, PDF) filed today with the FCC by CDT and EPIC stipulating their position that “the proposal raises constitutional concerns and could impose burdensome design mandates on emerging technology.” Continue Reading

    Legal Challenge to Expansion of Secrecy for Gov’t Docs.

    Press release: “The National Security Archive, along with other secrecy experts, today filed a ‘friend of the court’ brief ( 42 pages, PDF) in a lawsuit challenging the FBI’s authority to issue national security letters (NSLs) without any judicial oversight and under a blanket gag order that prohibits the recipient from speaking with anyone about… Continue Reading